Current:Home > MarketsWill Sage Astor-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -Mastery Money Tools
Will Sage Astor-Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Algosensey View
Date:2025-04-07 06:44:41
A federal court on Will Sage AstorWednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (74)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Rite Aid has filed for bankruptcy. What it means for the pharmacy chain and its customers
- The Indicator Quiz: Climate edition
- IOC president Thomas Bach has done enough damage. Don't give him time to do more.
- Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
- 21 Dog Walking Products to Make Your Daily Strolls Less Ruff
- Ford and Mercedes-Benz among nearly 250,000 vehicles recalled: Check car recalls here
- Who is Jim Jordan, House GOP speaker nominee?
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- 'The Daily Show' returns with jokes and serious talk about war in Israel
Ranking
- Global Warming Set the Stage for Los Angeles Fires
- Code Switch: Baltimore teens are fighting for environmental justice — and winning
- Is the ivory-billed woodpecker officially extinct? Not yet, but these 21 animals are
- Brussels shooter who killed 2 soccer fans in 'act of terrorism' shot dead by police
- Who's hosting 'Saturday Night Live' tonight? Musical guest, how to watch Dec. 14 episode
- Versailles Palace evacuated again for security alert amid high vigilance in France against attacks
- As Drought Grips the Southwest, Water Utilities Find the Hunt For More Workers Challenging
- Happy National Boss Day — but don't tell Bruce Springsteen: Why he hates his nickname
Recommendation
Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
U.S. book bans are taking a toll on a beloved tradition: Scholastic Book Fairs
Will Smith Turns Notifications Off After Jada Pinkett Smith Marriage Revelations
Overwhelmed by the war in Israel? Here's how to protect your mental health.
Meta releases AI model to enhance Metaverse experience
'Love is Blind' Season 5 reunion spoilers: Who's together, who tried again after the pods
Yuval Noah Harari on the Hamas attack: Terrorists are waging a war on our souls
'An entrepreneurial dream': Former 1930s Colorado ski resort lists for $7 million