Current:Home > ScamsJudge dismisses lawsuit by Musk’s X against nonprofit researchers tracking hate speech on platform -Mastery Money Tools
Judge dismisses lawsuit by Musk’s X against nonprofit researchers tracking hate speech on platform
View
Date:2025-04-12 08:23:57
A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit by Elon Musk’s X Corp. against the non-profit Center for Countering Digital Hate, which has documented the increase in hate speech on the site since it was acquired by the Tesla owner.
X, formerly known as Twitter, had argued the center’s researchers violated the site’s terms of service by improperly compiling public tweets, and that its subsequent reports on the rise of hate speech cost X millions of dollars when advertisers fled.
On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer dismissed the suit, writing in his order that it was “unabashedly and vociferously about one thing” — punishing the nonprofit for its speech.
X had alleged that the nonprofit “scraped” its site for data, which is against its terms of service. But the judge found that X failed to “allege losses based on technological harms” — that is, the company didn’t show how the scraping led to financial losses for X.
X had sought millions of dollars in damages, arguing that the nonprofit’s reports led to the exodus of advertisers and the loss of ad revenue.
But the judge agreed with CCDH’s argument saying X cannot seek damages for the independent acts of third parties based on CCDH’s reports, or its “speech.”
The center is a nonprofit with offices in the U.S. and United Kingdom. It regularly publishes reports on hate speech, extremism or harmful behavior on social media platforms like X, TikTok or Facebook. The organization has published several reports critical of Musk’s leadership, detailing a rise in anti-LGBTQ hate speech as well as climate misinformation since his purchase.
In a statement posted to X, the social media platform said it “disagrees with the court’s decision and plans to appeal.”
Imran Ahmed, the center’s founder and CEO, said the lawsuit amounted to a “hypocritical campaign of harassment” by a billionaire who talks about protecting free speech but who then uses his wealth to try to silence his critics. He said the lawsuit shows the need for a federal law requiring tech companies to release more information about their operations, so that the public can understand how these powerful platforms are shaping society.
“We hope this landmark ruling will embolden public-interest researchers everywhere to continue, and even intensify, their vital work of holding social media companies accountable for the hate and disinformation they host and the harm they cause,” said Ahmed.
Roberta Kaplan, the center’s attorney, said the dismissal of X’s suit shows “even the wealthiest man cannot bend the rule of law to his will.”
“We are living in an age of bullies, and it’s social media that gives them the power that they have today,” Kaplan said in an email to reporters. “It takes great courage to stand up to these bullies; it takes an organization like the Center for Countering Digital Hate. We are proud and honored to represent CCDH.”
The center is not the only group that has pointed to the rise of hateful material on X since Musk’s purchase in October 2022. Last November, several big advertisers including IBM, NBCUniversal and its parent company Comcast, said that they stopped advertising on X after a report from the liberal advocacy group Media Matters said their ads were appearing alongside material praising Nazis. It was yet another setback as X tries to win back big brands and their ad dollars, X’s main source of revenue. X has also sued Media Matters.
Later that month, Musk went on an expletive-ridden rant in response to advertisers that halted spending on X in response to antisemitic and other hateful material, saying they are are engaging in “blackmail” and, using a profanity, essentially told them to go away.
veryGood! (44)
Related
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Kidnapped Texas girl rescued in California after holding up help me sign inside car
- Russia detains a 'Wall Street Journal' reporter on claims of spying
- Trump trial date in classified documents case set for May 20, 2024
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Nintendo's Wii U and 3DS stores closing means game over for digital archives
- Oklahoma executes man who stabbed Tulsa woman to death after escaping from prison work center in 1995
- Sophia Culpo’s Ex Braxton Berrios Responds to Cheating Allegations
- The city of Chicago is ordered to pay nearly $80M for a police chase that killed a 10
- Twitter says parts of its source code were leaked online
Ranking
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- Investigators looking into whether any of the Gilgo Beach murder victims may have been killed at home suspect shared with his family
- The NBA and its players have a deal for a new labor agreement
- Beating the odds: Glioblastoma patient thriving 6 years after being told he had 6 months to live
- The FTC says 'gamified' online job scams by WhatsApp and text on the rise. What to know.
- Simone Biles Is Making a Golden Return to Competitive Gymnastics 2 Years After Tokyo Olympics Run
- Barack Obama drops summer playlist including Ice Spice, Luke Combs, Tina Turner and Peso Pluma
- A Just Transition? On Brooklyn’s Waterfront, Oil Companies and Community Activists Join Together to Create an Offshore Wind Project—and Jobs
Recommendation
The FBI should have done more to collect intelligence before the Capitol riot, watchdog finds
Disney World board picked by DeSantis says predecessors stripped them of power
The Perseids — the best meteor shower of the year — are back. Here's how to watch.
NFL owners unanimously approve $6 billion sale of Washington Commanders
Alex Murdaugh’s murder appeal cites biased clerk and prejudicial evidence
Russia detains a 'Wall Street Journal' reporter on claims of spying
Photo of Connecticut McDonald's $18 Big Mac meal sparks debate online
Watch Oppenheimer discuss use of the atomic bomb in 1965 interview: It was not undertaken lightly